Citizenship revocation proceedings begin
Canadian immigration authorities have formally notified Rana of their intent to strip him of the citizenship he obtained in 2001. The action is based on allegations that he misrepresented his residency history during the application process, rather than on terrorism-related charges.Officials allege that Rana falsely claimed continuous residence in Canada, while investigators later found he had spent significant time living in Chicago during the relevant period.
Who is Tahawwur Rana?
Rana, a Pakistan-born businessman and former military doctor, is accused of playing a role in planning the 26/11 Mumbai attacks that killed 166 people.He immigrated to Canada in 1997 and later became a citizen, before being arrested in the United States in 2009 on terrorism-related charges.
After prolonged legal proceedings, he was extradited to India in 2025 and is currently in the custody of the National Investigation Agency, where he awaits trial.
Timing linked to diplomatic reset
The move comes ahead of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s planned India visit, part of a broader effort to reset bilateral relations that have faced turbulence in recent years.Analysts see the decision as a significant diplomatic signal, as counterterrorism cooperation remains a key area of shared interest between the two countries.
Why the revocation matters
If finalized, revoking Rana’s citizenship would mark a rare and consequential step by Canada, underscoring its stance on immigration integrity and international security cooperation. While the legal basis focuses on alleged misrepresentation, the timing highlights the broader geopolitical context surrounding Carney’s visit and ongoing efforts to strengthen India–Canada ties.Looking ahead
Rana has the right to challenge the revocation through Canada’s legal system, meaning the process could take months or longer to conclude. Meanwhile, his trial in India is expected to remain a focal point in the pursuit of justice for the victims of the Mumbai attacks.As Carney prepares to arrive in India, the case is poised to become a significant talking point — not only for its legal implications but also for what it signals about the future of India–Canada relations.